The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development (Di Fabio, 2017a, 2017b; Di Fabio &
Rosen, 2018; Di Fabio & Tsuda, 2018) (a) focuses
on well-being; (b) at levels of interaction including those of
individuals, groups, organizations, and systems; and (c) is concerned
with processes that are robust, consistent, and enduring. In contrast to
traditional approaches that focus on avoidance (exploitation, depletion,
irreversible alteration), the PSSD approach focuses on promotion
(enrichment, growth, and flexible change). In this way,
sustainable psychology may have (surprisingly) less to do with
what is studied and more to do with the attitudes and
approaches to studying it. In the context of the Bikos RVT, you will
likely recognize overlaps with vocational (e.g., “Is it
reasonable to frame maskmaking during the pandemic as calling?”) and
global (e.g., “How does geopolitical context influence
attitudes toware mask-wearing?”) psychology.
As the U.S. was coming to terms with the seriousness of the pandemic,
we launched a pair of studies that focus on facemasks. Both were 12 to
24 wave, longitudinal studies.
The unique focus of #MaskMadness is about wearing facemasks.
Specifically, we are assessing reaction to seeing others’ in facemasks
and the experiences of wearing the facemasks in public. Meta-data that
is collected in Qualtrics has allowed us to collect contextual
information (e.g., voting trends, weekly rates of positive COVID tests
and COVID-related deaths) to see how they interact with individual
factors (e.g., job loss) to predict health and safety practices around
COVID (e.g., social distancing, hand-washing, wearing facemasks) and
well-being.
“Maskmaker” (yes, a play on “Matchmaker Matchmaker” from Fiddler on the Roof) augmented the #MaskMadness study with its focus on those sewing cloth facemasks. Maskmakers were asked to report their weekly productivity as well as reflect on why they engaged in maskmaking and how it was going.
The I/O students in a summer qualitative research methods class analyzed the data and found that it fit well to the work-as-calling theory (Duffy et al., 2018). We are presently analyzing quantitative data to see if it will map similarly.
At WPA 2022 we contributed three presentations to the symposium title, “The On-and-Off-Again of Facemasks in the COVID-19 Pandemic.” The first two presentations focused on maskmaking, analyzing it against the work-as-calling theory. The second presentation examined the effects of facemask-wearing stigma and geopolitical context on well-being
At WPA 2021(Virtual) we provided a symposium presentation (only 17 minutes) summarizing the qualitative data from the MaskMaker study. It fit well to the work-as-calling theory.
Check out our livestreaming presentation from FaceBook where we
presented qualitative,
results from the Maskmaker Study.
Also available for viewing is our WPA2020
symposium presentation from the Birds of a Feather (Gibbs et al., 2020) study. This study
was based on Renee Gibbs(’11) doctoral dissertation.